I don't know the way that most of the people evaluate if something is truer than other thing or if something is false because all the people has the right to choose what they want to believe and the reason they have to do that, but I know the way I evaluate. I hear or see the things given to me, then I analyze the whole point of it and I deduct if something is credible or not.
After reading this chapter I came to think that it can be that I am wrong or not wrong but using only a few ways to know if something is true.The chapter made me think that all what I thought was real is not real at all. Now I think everything is conventional because in the book Savater wrote something that is very logic, he wrote hat for example information changes because people discover new things.
I agree with Savater because he wrote that there is not an absolute true and I also think that, but I also think that there are three types of truths: truths that are not absolut but really big and strong enough to battle illusions, truths that help people to move on on their lives and truths about yourself that you are the only person who know them. Maybe it is not right to let yourself us only one of those truths but when you mix them up then you have a really good combination of truths that help your reasoning in addition to the information or experiences you have.
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario